Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- New Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Revealed July 2010
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-3 and Sony T99, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and T99 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and T99 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-3 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the T99 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-3 grades vs the T99 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony T99
E-3 | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Olympus E-3
T99 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 28 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony T99
E-3 | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 comes with outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-3 and Sony T99 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-3 compared to the T99.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and T99 is 56 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and T99.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-3 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony T99 will result in more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Sony T99 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $670 | $179 |