Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48


95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Released July 2010

Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-3 and Sony TX9, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

The E-3 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TX9 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-3 matches up against the TX9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony TX9
E-3 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-3
TX9 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2010 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 28 months |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony TX9
E-3 | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-3 offers exterior dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has measurements of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 and Sony TX9 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-3 and the TX9.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and TX9 is 56 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and TX9.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony TX9 will produce more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-3 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $670 | $799 |