Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-3 versus Sony W320, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was announced 22 months prior to the W320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-3 grades versus the W320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Sony W320
E-3 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-3
W320 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 22 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Sony W320
E-3 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-3 comes with exterior measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") along with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) and the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 versus Sony W320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-3 versus the W320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and W320 is 56 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and W320.
As you can see, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony W320 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890 grams (1.96 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $670 | $269 |