Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and E-M1 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-30 was manufactured 5 years prior to the E-M1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-30 scores versus the E-M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus E-M1
E-30 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus E-30
E-M1 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 55 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus E-M1
E-30 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-30 comes with physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-30 vs the E-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f7f9/0f7f963840f1d99fd68edc775014ac8289b5c249" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and E-M1 is 60 and 71 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b690/5b6901b28a00f3a3be7a8d68ae94a0cbbd204e2d" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and E-M1.
As you can see, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus E-M1 to render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9e33/d9e339f5b5d4e93711cf0971b1d3126da99b7905" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dff1a/dff1a1c31b65b6bf275a5ba9af74cfbc644d3494" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2013-10-28 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lbs) | 497 gr (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | 530 | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-1 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,299 | $799 |