Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-30 was released 10 months before the SP-800 UZ which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-30 grades versus the SP-800 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-30 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-30
SP-800 UZ | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 10 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-30 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") and a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus SP-800 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-30 and the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e8de/5e8dee8c7c9d931f455ef20bd4debbbd6993fa87" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and SP-800 UZ is 60 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/702e0/702e0b401b7f994ba852591bb979c997439b94f2" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and SP-800 UZ.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-30 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-30 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d82e/6d82e5e8de33a8bcc1b97e59aa6b827efdcd18b6" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c020/9c0208fd47521f863d9c30dce4276f9059e65c10" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 12s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $1,299 | $270 |