Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8df78/8df78639e31f6f9cab0cd6bb2ccb49100f8299fb" alt="Olympus SZ-12 front Olympus SZ-12 front"
89 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus SZ-12, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the SZ-12 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-30 was launched 3 years before the SZ-12 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-30 matches up vs the SZ-12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-30 & Olympus SZ-12. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus SZ-12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus SZ-12
E-30 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-30
SZ-12 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Fresher by 34 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus SZ-12
E-30 | SZ-12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-30 provides outside measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") and a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-12 has dimensions of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus SZ-12 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-30 against the SZ-12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad093/ad0939287cc09fa264293a6eff1c90b8697e51ac" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and SZ-12 is 60 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae4c1/ae4c1fc78211def7d2814a7fe45f1372f5f65648" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and SZ-12.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-30 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SZ-12 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01f3b/01f3b422405fea11773dd79c707189118c418fb3" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf093/cf0938bab993d025d19173c03fd960da6e7d3df4" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus SZ-12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Olympus SZ-12 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1700 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,299 | $350 |