Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus 9000, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-30 was manufactured around the same time to the 9000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-30 grades versus the 9000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus 9000
E-30 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-30
9000 | E-30 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus 9000
E-30 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2009 | May 2009 | Same generation | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-30 provides physical dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus 9000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-30 vs the 9000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and 9000 is 60 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by seeing specs. The photograph underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and 9000.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-30 offers the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler.
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Alternative name | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,299 | $300 |