Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Announced March 2009
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released February 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus SH-3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-30 was introduced 7 years prior to the SH-3 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-30 grades against the SH-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus SH-3

 E-30 SH-3 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-30

 SH-3 E-30 
ReleasedFebruary 2016March 2009Fresher by 83 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus SH-3

 E-30 SH-3 

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 enjoys external dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

See the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-30 against the SH-3.

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and SH-3 is 60 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-30 and SH-3.

All in all, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography details
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography details
59
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
44
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Street photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Street photography camera
72
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
70
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
includes touch focus
lighter than average (271g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Sports photography camera
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
terrible battery life (750 CIPA)
51
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery power (380 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Travel photography camera
49
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
no Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (750 shots)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
74
great battery power (380 CIPA)
lighter than average (271g)
includes touch focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography advice
Olympus SH-3 Landscape photography advice
52
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
megapixel count low (12MP)
terrible battery life (750 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
55
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (380 per charge)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Vlogging camera
18
can't record video
35
really wide (25mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than average (271 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Olympus SH-3
 Olympus E-30Olympus Stylus SH-3
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-30 Olympus Stylus SH-3
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-03-24 2016-02-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per second 11.5 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash modes Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lbs) 271 grams (0.60 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 pictures 380 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLM-1 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $1,299 $579