Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus TG-870, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-30 was launched 7 years before the TG-870 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-30 scores against the TG-870 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus TG-870
E-30 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-30
TG-870 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 82 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-870
E-30 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 enjoys external measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-30 versus Olympus TG-870 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-30 against the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8faf6/8faf6d7383ce8dac15264e284ecff173ba4f9eea" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and TG-870 is 60 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d53af/d53af9f7e749dd173a546db4766eb879c8fdb975" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and TG-870.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-30 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-870 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/229ff/229ff6b04aed7f9cbac01cdb7236ca1e8244e5d3" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7d16/c7d16f4e8f6e29e1e2108139bed3da61e57d7b64" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 pictures | 300 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $1,299 | $280 |