Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Launched March 2009
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Launched April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

The following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-4, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-30 was announced 7 years before the TG-4 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-30 matches up against the TG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus TG-4

 E-30 TG-4 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-30

 TG-4 E-30 
LaunchedApril 2015March 2009Newer by 73 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-4

 E-30 TG-4 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 has got exterior measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-30 versus the TG-4.

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and TG-4 is 60 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and TG-4.

As you can see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-30 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-4 will offer you more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-30
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-4
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
47
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW files
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-30
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
72
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (247g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography factors
51
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
bad battery (750 per charge)
48
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 Travel photography info
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography info
49
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery (750 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
74
better than average battery (380 shots)
environment sealing
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than average in class (247 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography highlights
52
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
bad battery (750 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
62
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
better than average battery (380 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
18
can't shoot video
34
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic support
heavier than average in class (247 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-30 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Olympus TG-4
 Olympus E-30Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-30 Olympus Tough TG-4
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2009-03-24 2015-04-13
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash options Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lb) 247 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 images 380 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLM-1 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $1,299 $379