Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-30 and Olympus VG-145, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-30 was unveiled 3 years before the VG-145 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-30 grades versus the VG-145 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 and Olympus VG-145. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus VG-145
E-30 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-30
VG-145 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus VG-145
E-30 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 has external dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus VG-145 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 and Olympus VG-145 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-30 vs the VG-145.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19173/19173fa511cf8e7290256f27aba5eaef602a20f1" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and VG-145 is 60 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0fd2/e0fd24db75b7ec03b1743ba6064f77c8d40fdc83" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and VG-145.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-30 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VG-145 will produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-30 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b092b/b092b553ded25676fd2a4da246d74fe6b5c6e4c2" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d275/6d275cd6f6d4257fb4bd118bc1f156c98c3ddee0" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lb) | 120 gr (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photographs | 160 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $1,299 | $0 |