Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-30 was revealed 4 years prior to the VH-410 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-30 scores versus the VH-410 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 & Olympus VH-410. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus VH-410
E-30 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-30
VH-410 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus VH-410
E-30 | VH-410 |
---|
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 provides exterior measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-30 compared to the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa101/aa1010d832440ec8e7dd707ff6a1f26b240e2c80" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and VH-410 is 60 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ea65/1ea65228223bbea5fad19d920d247219a71bd881" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The image below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and VH-410.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-30 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus VH-410 will result in extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-30 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fa24/4fa241627e1a41686e29998b786eb3a758af5855" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18fa7/18fa70f26be3ea744758617cc1dcc5bb78b6a5c2" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Olympus VH-410 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 grams (1.53 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $1,299 | $186 |