Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-30 was announced 3 years before the VR-340 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-30 matches up versus the VR-340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 & Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Olympus VR-340
E-30 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-30
VR-340 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 34 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Olympus VR-340
E-30 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 comes with physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") and a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-30 versus the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59e83/59e831e2728393b03d8513cf275a846d2cd465c8" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and VR-340 is 60 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/075f0/075f0264fb541a64c9e816f4d219c18c81b76b7d" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and VR-340.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-30 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will show extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7a7e/d7a7ec8ca0102922741fecb8e69f79a739f29129" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a909/3a909fdccc0fe1ea27f8492bc0f941d0470783f5" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Olympus VR-340 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,299 | $130 |