Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aea2e/aea2eaaf83f43ab5c09e1ef48ec446437cef3c4e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Introduced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Revealed November 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic 3D1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and 3D1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-30 was introduced 3 years earlier than the 3D1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-30 grades against the 3D1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic 3D1
E-30 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus E-30
3D1 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2011 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic 3D1
E-30 | 3D1 |
---|
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-30 has got physical dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Panasonic 3D1 has measurements of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic 3D1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-30 compared to the 3D1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8413b/8413b44791f6eb2092ef82c92d7bd7f9e858a5cb" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and 3D1 is 60 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/395ff/395ff383af5a1c19ef427dd18d32c0898e1b43b2" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The picture here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-30 and 3D1.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-30 contains the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-30 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f6e/e4f6e1bc625dc8fdedff095a4f4e9ff9021a519a" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51ace/51ace630c2281e4a969e14cea15996d160dfbc04" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-03-24 | 2011-11-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photos | 200 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLM-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $670 |