Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FS42, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is very comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-30 was launched very close to the FS42 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-30 matches up versus the FS42 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic FS42
E-30 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-30
FS42 | E-30 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FS42
E-30 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2009 | ![]() | April 2009 | Same age |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 offers outside measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-30 versus the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbbc4/bbbc41dfe60471bf14fc5ef5f896ff8aeaa30fb0" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and FS42 is 60 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d629/8d6297836d5d800e43b59c323a770480e528f28f" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and FS42.
As you have seen, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-30 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-30 will show more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90f8e/90f8ee90928feb76e1c6a97078d8a24498b050cf" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c1c2/4c1c2b1e921711e910ba82ceef7e0352c4aaa2fa" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-03-24 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 lb) | 132g (0.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $580 |