Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a220c/a220c2e13d4b7304cd494deb3786cbaa31bcfeb7" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Released March 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-30 was released 14 months prior to the FX75 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-30 scores against the FX75 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-30 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic FX75
E-30 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-30
FX75 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 14 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FX75
E-30 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 offers outer dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-30 compared to the FX75.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2817a/2817aaa2adea07ee4f93c3861dcd647f532488f3" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and FX75 is 60 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7934/d7934eda358b20c7aa05e963404e81d43a60cf81" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and FX75.
As you have seen, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-30 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9f29/e9f2965044b64c94ee385181ce19c813284f730b" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7162/d71628050390130a835f20c9cac6e2a5144bd376" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-03-24 | 2010-06-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 7.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 lbs) | 165g (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $1,299 | $139 |