Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Introduced March 2009
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Released July 2012
  • Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic FZ200, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-30 was brought out 4 years earlier than the FZ200 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-30 scores against the FZ200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-30 FZ200 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-30

 FZ200 E-30 
ReleasedJuly 2012March 2009Newer by 40 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FZ200

 E-30 FZ200 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 enjoys external dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-30 against the FZ200.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and FZ200 is 60 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The pic here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and FZ200.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution but different sensor dimensions. The E-30 has the larger sensor which should make getting bokeh less difficult. The more aged E-30 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography details
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
48
focusing manually
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography factors
72
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
57
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (588g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography details
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (750 shots)
46
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
good battery life (540 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 Travel photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography features
49
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
missing Timelapse function
bad battery life (750 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
55
good battery life (540 CIPA)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (588 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography details
52
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (750 per charge)
missing Timelapse function
48
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (540 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 Vlogging features
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging features
18
lack of video recording
63
reasonably wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes mic jack
slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (588g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus E-30Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-30 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Category Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-03-24 2012-07-18
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology HyperCrystal II LCD Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 98% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695 gr (1.53 pounds) 588 gr (1.30 pounds)
Dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 37
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 10.8
DXO Low light score 530 114
Other
Battery life 750 photographs 540 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLM-1 -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $1,299 $499