Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Revealed March 2009
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Announced January 2014
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
  • Renewed by Panasonic ZS40
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-30 was launched 5 years before the ZS35 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-30 grades vs the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-30 ZS35 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-30

 ZS35 E-30 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014March 2009More recent by 58 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic ZS35

 E-30 ZS35 
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 has got outside measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-30 compared to the ZS35.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and ZS35 is 60 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and ZS35.

As you can see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-30 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Portrait photography camera
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
37
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS35 Street photography information
72
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
68
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (305 grams)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Sports photography camera
51
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
bad battery life (750 CIPA)
53
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
49
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (750 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
68
lighter than average (305g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-30
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS35
52
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (750 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
44
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 Vlogging features
Panasonic ZS35 Vlogging features
18
no video shooting
34
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (305g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
missing external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus E-30Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-30 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-03-24 2014-01-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 11 21
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal II LCD TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 13.00 m 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695 gr (1.53 lb) 305 gr (0.67 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLM-1 -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $1,299 $300