Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b96/79b9603f77f7c51f1ac0c53523d43d29d519fd6f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front"
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-30 was launched 5 years before the ZS35 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-30 grades vs the ZS35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-30 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-30 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-30
ZS35 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 58 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Panasonic ZS35
E-30 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 has got outside measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-30 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-30 compared to the ZS35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5f31/c5f319bd95be9f4624e757550b4ce05e1310d765" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and ZS35 is 60 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca3f/4ca3f0917850360199480ba5a60de77a3a75fc63" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and ZS35.
As you can see, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-30 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The older E-30 will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a26a6/a26a64bbd0404b46f9162693f6e2c11cb71ae18c" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0558/e05586183921d3e6a369986c7338a29e1cbb5b23" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-30 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLM-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,299 | $300 |