Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47d9e/47d9e78f8a74376d0dbc30182b029c20ad373abd" alt="Ricoh G700SE front Ricoh G700SE front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Released October 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and G700SE (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-30 was brought out 18 months earlier than the G700SE which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh G700SE being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the E-30 matches up vs the G700SE in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh G700SE. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh G700SE
E-30 | G700SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Olympus E-30
G700SE | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2010 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 18 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh G700SE
E-30 | G700SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G700SE has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-30 compared to the G700SE.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be22f/be22f11c09e0e3998558bfa4dad28d247edc17ca" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and G700SE is 60 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4be6d/4be6d12ab718d56c3652ae62d7e8d086c83062d1" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and G700SE.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-30 comes with the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-30 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71833/71833952d00275c39d8d24009a816c709d7f8856" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71a30/71a30331d0a5cde6acb14cd7e2dba3013cf88e19" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Ricoh G700SE | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Ricoh G700SE |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-03-24 | 2010-10-13 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 pounds) | 307g (0.68 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | DB-60 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $0 |