Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Introduced March 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use different sensor sizes.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

The E-30 was brought out 3 years before the GR Digital IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-30 matches up vs the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-30 GR Digital IV 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-30

 GR Digital IV E-30 
IntroducedSeptember 2011March 2009Fresher by 30 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-30 GR Digital IV 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 offers physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-30 compared to the GR Digital IV.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and GR Digital IV is 60 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and GR Digital IV.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-30 will give extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-30 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-30
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
saves RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
40
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography info
72
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
64
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography highlights
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery (750 per charge)
33
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good battery life (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
49
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery (750 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
67
good battery life (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-30
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
52
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.7")
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery (750 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
52
focusing manually
very good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (390 per charge)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging details
18
can't shoot video
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus E-30Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-30 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-03-24 2011-09-15
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/1.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 photographs 390 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLM-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $1,299 $599