Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Introduced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use different sensor sizes.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe E-30 was brought out 3 years before the GR Digital IV and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-30 matches up vs the GR Digital IV with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| E-30 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-30
| GR Digital IV | E-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 | March 2009 | Fresher by 30 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| E-30 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 offers physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-30 compared to the GR Digital IV.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and GR Digital IV is 60 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-30 will give extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-30 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Olympus E-30 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-30 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-03-24 | 2011-09-15 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/1.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 695 grams (1.53 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 750 photographs | 390 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLM-1 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $1,299 | $599 |