Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Ricoh WG-5 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Launched March 2009
Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
  • Revealed February 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
  • Updated by Ricoh WG-6
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-30 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and WG-5 GPS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-30 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-30 grades against the WG-5 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 E-30 WG-5 GPS 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus E-30

 WG-5 GPS E-30 
RevealedFebruary 2015March 2009Fresher by 71 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS

 E-30 WG-5 GPS 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-30 has got outer measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-30 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-30 compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and WG-5 GPS is 60 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and WG-5 GPS.

All in all, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-30 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS will give you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-30 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Portrait photography information
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
low resolution (12MP)
41
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography info
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Street photography info
72
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than average (236 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sports photography details
51
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (750 shots)
48
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-30
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
49
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
no Timelapse mode
not so great battery pack (750 CIPA)
low resolution (12MP)
69
weather sealing
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery pack (240 shots)
more heavy than average (236g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-5 GPS Landscape photography features
52
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
low resolution (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (750 shots)
no Timelapse mode
54
focusing manually
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-30
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-5 GPS
18
can't record video
34
really wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no external microphone support
more heavy than average (236 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-30 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
 Olympus E-30Ricoh WG-5 GPS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-30 Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2009-03-24 2015-02-10
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 5.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 10.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695g (1.53 lb) 236g (0.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 images 240 images
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLM-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at release $1,299 $500