Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-30 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively close but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-30 was unveiled 14 months earlier than the HZ35W which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-30 scores vs the HZ35W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Samsung HZ35W
E-30 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-30
HZ35W | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | March 2009 | Newer by 14 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Samsung HZ35W
E-30 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 has external measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-30 versus Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-30 vs the HZ35W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and HZ35W is 60 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The image below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and HZ35W.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-30 contains the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The more aged E-30 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-30 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | - | WB650 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-03-24 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,299 | $300 |