Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-30 was introduced 6 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-30 matches up versus the SD9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 & Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sigma SD9
| E-30 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2009 |  | November 2002 | Fresher by 77 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-30
| SD9 | E-30 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sigma SD9
| E-30 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 has exterior dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-30 vs the SD9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and SD9 is 60 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and SD9.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-30 will deliver greater detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher E-30 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus E-30 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus E-30 | Sigma SD9 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-03-24 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 695g (1.53 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 750 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLM-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,299 | $3,001 |