Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9
60 Imaging
47 Features
54 Overall
49
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Announced March 2009
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-30 was introduced 6 years later than the SD9 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-30 matches up versus the SD9 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 & Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sigma SD9
| E-30 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2009 |  | November 2002 | Fresher by 77 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 130k | Clearer display (+100k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-30
| SD9 | E-30 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sigma SD9
| E-30 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 has exterior dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) while the Sigma SD9 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-30 vs the SD9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and SD9 is 60 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and SD9.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-30 will deliver greater detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher E-30 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-30 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Olympus E-30 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus E-30 | Sigma SD9 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-03-24 | 2002-11-26 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 1.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 13.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 695g (1.53 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 530 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 750 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLM-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $1,299 | $3,001 |
