Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200

Portability
60
Imaging
47
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
50
Features
38
Overall
45

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Announced March 2009
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Released July 2008
  • Renewed by Sony A230
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-30 and Sony A200, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-30 was brought out 9 months after the A200 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-30 matches up against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony A200

 E-30 A200 
ReleasedMarch 2009July 2008More modern by 9 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-30

 A200 E-30 

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony A200

 E-30 A200 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display size
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 has exterior measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

See the Olympus E-30 and Sony A200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-30 compared to the A200.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and A200 is 60 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and A200.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-30 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-30 will give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-30 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography info
Sony A200 Portrait photography info
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
54
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography features
Sony A200 Street photography features
72
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-30
Sports photography with Sony A200
52
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (750 CIPA)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-30
Travel photography with Sony A200
49
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse recording
not so great battery pack (750 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
46
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A200 as a Landscape photography camera
52
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
not so great battery pack (750 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
54
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inch)
no liveview feature
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-30
Vlogging with Sony A200
18
no video recording
9
no video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Sony A200
 Olympus E-30Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-30 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2009-03-24 2008-07-17
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 98% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695 gr (1.53 pounds) 572 gr (1.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 63
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 11.3
DXO Low light rating 530 521
Other
Battery life 750 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLM-1 -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $1,299 $100