Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Launched March 2009
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Superseded the Sony A200
  • Later Model is Sony A290
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-30 versus Sony A230, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-30 (12MP) and the A230 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-30 (Four Thirds) and A230 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-30 was unveiled within a month of the A230 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-30 matches up versus the A230 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony A230

 E-30 A230 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus E-30

 A230 E-30 

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony A230

 E-30 A230 
LaunchedMarch 2009May 2009Same age
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display size
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-30 has got outer measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") along with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-30 versus Sony A230 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-30 compared to the A230.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and A230 is 60 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and A230.

All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-30 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-30 will provide extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography details
Sony A230 Portrait photography details
59
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
54
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography advice
Sony A230 Street photography advice
72
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography factors
Sony A230 Sports photography factors
51
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
low battery (750 CIPA)
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (10MP)
low battery pack (230 shots)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 Travel photography advice
Sony A230 Travel photography advice
49
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
lack of Timelapse recording
low battery (750 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
45
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low battery pack (230 per charge)
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography factors
Sony A230 Landscape photography factors
52
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
low battery (750 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
51
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
doesn't have liveview
resolution not great (10MP)
low battery pack (230 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 Vlogging highlights
Sony A230 Vlogging highlights
18
can't record video
9
can't shoot video
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-30 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Sony A230
 Olympus E-30Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-30 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Type Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2009-03-24 2009-05-18
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x 0.55x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lbs) 490 grams (1.08 lbs)
Dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 63
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 11.4
DXO Low light score 530 531
Other
Battery life 750 photos 230 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLM-1 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $1,299 $569