Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front
Portability
91
Imaging
56
Features
57
Overall
56

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Launched March 2009
Sony NEX-C3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
  • Revealed August 2011
  • Superseded the Sony NEX-3
  • Updated by Sony NEX-F3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The E-30 was brought out 3 years prior to the NEX-C3 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-30 grades against the NEX-C3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony NEX-C3

 E-30 NEX-C3 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-30

 NEX-C3 E-30 
RevealedAugust 2011March 2009More recent by 29 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-C3

 E-30 NEX-C3 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-30 features outside dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has measurements of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-30 vs the NEX-C3.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-30 and NEX-C3 is 60 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-30 and NEX-C3.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-30 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-C3 will render greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The older E-30 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-C3 as a Portrait photography camera
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
73
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-30
Street photography with Sony NEX-C3
72
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
79
screen tilts up and down
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than average in class (225g)
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography factors
Sony NEX-C3 Sports photography factors
51
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps low (5.0 fps)
MP count low (12MP)
bad battery (750 per charge)
53
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good battery power (400 per charge)
max frames per second low (6.0 fps)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-30 Travel photography factors
Sony NEX-C3 Travel photography factors
49
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery (750 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
71
good battery power (400 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (225 grams)
resolution is good (16MP)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography info
Sony NEX-C3 Landscape photography info
52
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery (750 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
70
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3")
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
good battery power (400 shots)
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-30
Vlogging with Sony NEX-C3
18
can't shoot video
27
lighter than average in class (225g)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-C3
 Olympus E-30Sony Alpha NEX-C3
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-30 Sony Alpha NEX-C3
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2009-03-24 2011-08-22
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech HyperCrystal II LCD TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lb) 225 grams (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 73
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 12.2
DXO Low light score 530 1083
Other
Battery life 750 photographs 400 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLM-1 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $1,299 $343