Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90dc9/90dc94a541028ea772791a0c7d7016eaa915f96a" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front"
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Successor is Sony NEX-3N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-F3, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-30 was brought out 4 years earlier than the NEX-F3 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-30 grades vs the NEX-F3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-30 and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony NEX-F3
E-30 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-30
NEX-F3 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-F3
E-30 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-30 comes with physical dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-30 and Sony NEX-F3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-30 against the NEX-F3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b89a/2b89a918f96334edfa0e215ca4debc88f881c166" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and NEX-F3 is 60 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b769d/b769d7dc8527ab5e85a50d74908a5babe45d5434" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The pic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-30 and NEX-F3.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-30 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will resolve greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8de8/a8de8e86377fd0a3514c6cf148d4b03e4cc89a99" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3914f/3914f8e99f3687383fe777526bb0c78ab5861c57" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-03-24 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695g (1.53 lbs) | 314g (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 shots | 470 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $470 |