Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1

Portability
60
Imaging
47
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Revealed March 2009
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Overview

In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-30 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the QX1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-30 scores against the QX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony QX1

 E-30 QX1 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-30

 QX1 E-30 
RevealedSeptember 2014March 2009Fresher by 66 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony QX1

 E-30 QX1 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 enjoys exterior dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") having a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-30 compared to the QX1.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-30 and QX1 is 60 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-30 and QX1.

As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-30 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony QX1 will show greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-30 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography info
Sony QX1 Portrait photography info
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
66
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-30 Street photography factors
Sony QX1 Street photography factors
72
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
69
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-30
Sports photography with Sony QX1
52
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery power (750 shots)
56
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery pack (440 CIPA)
slow frames per second (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-30
Travel photography with Sony QX1
49
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery power (750 CIPA)
resolution not great (12MP)
71
good battery pack (440 CIPA)
offers focus by touch
MP count good (20MP)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (216 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography details
Sony QX1 Landscape photography details
52
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery power (750 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
64
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (440 shots)
screen is small (")
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 Vlogging factors
Sony QX1 Vlogging factors
18
no video
32
touchscreen functionality
offers face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
missing microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (216g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-30 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Sony QX1
 Olympus E-30Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-30 Sony Alpha QX1
Type Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Revealed 2009-03-24 2014-09-03
Body design Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 3200 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches -
Display resolution 230k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695 gr (1.53 lbs) 216 gr (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 530 not tested
Other
Battery life 750 photographs 440 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLM-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $1,299 $500