Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a1f/04a1f3ad992de867dcbb3b964aee0d2661adec42" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front"
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Launched March 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Introduced February 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and RX1 (Full frame) provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-30 was launched 4 years before the RX1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-30 grades versus the RX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-30 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony RX1
E-30 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus E-30
RX1 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 47 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony RX1
E-30 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-30 provides physical measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") along with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-30 against the RX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff2fe/ff2fed2c706359bd23680edbf4ff8ea710ddb399" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and RX1 is 60 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9607/c960733bc1ad8b432a1b6596eecf1cad1a2276cd" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The image below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-30 and RX1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-30 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sony RX1 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-30 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4258/a42581cc5cc6ad7c714dccd29890e9e9c94bf50f" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/912f7/912f715fe178a76da014cfb2ac18eca62bfae14e" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-03-24 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-22.0 |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal II LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 gr (1.53 lbs) | 482 gr (1.06 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 shots | 270 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,299 | $2,798 |