Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III
60 Imaging
46 Features
54 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2b6a/e2b6a99bc4a925f1c8cd436152dc65ffa905c44d" alt="Olympus E-30 front Olympus E-30 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eadd/6eadd23cb6eb920907ea68f225c04742fabb0e6f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Revealed March 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
- Successor is Sony RX10 IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-30 versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-30 was announced 8 years before the RX10 III and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-30 scores vs the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-30 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-30 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony RX10 III
E-30 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-30
RX10 III | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2016 | ![]() | March 2009 | More recent by 85 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony RX10 III
E-30 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 enjoys external measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-30 versus Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-30 against the RX10 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bfa5/1bfa5e07731d415da690f2c3fed87c04a7311eba" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and RX10 III is 60 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dd5d/3dd5d32342b527354126403302d3ca2403b5950d" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and RX10 III.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-30 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony RX10 III will offer you more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-30 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3491/d34916f0c4c7cd0a759dc747ec36d1d02cf5e8a4" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d110/2d1106151959c24f65e6723349dfd8054fa30a41" alt="Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-03-24 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal II LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.56x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 695 grams (1.53 lbs) | 1051 grams (2.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 530 | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 750 pictures | 420 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLM-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $1,398 |