Clicky

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
60
Imaging
46
Features
54
Overall
49
Olympus E-30 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-30
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
  • Revealed March 2009
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Launched March 2016
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Successor is Sony RX10 IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-30 versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-30 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-30 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") boast different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-30 was announced 8 years before the RX10 III and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-30 scores vs the RX10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-30 RX10 III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-30

 RX10 III E-30 
LaunchedMarch 2016March 2009More recent by 85 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1229k230kClearer screen (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-30 and Sony RX10 III

 E-30 RX10 III 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-30 enjoys external measurements of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") having a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-30 versus Sony RX10 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-30 against the RX10 III.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-30 and RX10 III is 60 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-30 and RX10 III.

As you can tell, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-30 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony RX10 III will offer you more detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-30 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-30 Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography factors
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
71
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-30
Street photography with Sony RX10 III
72
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
64
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is nice (1")
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-30 Sports photography information
Sony RX10 III Sports photography information
51
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery power (750 shots)
70
long zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery power (420 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-30
Travel photography with Sony RX10 III
49
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
lack of Timelapse function
not so great battery power (750 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
55
great battery power (420 CIPA)
environment sealing
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (600mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-30 Landscape photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography highlights
52
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery power (750 shots)
lack of Timelapse function
63
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (1")
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
great battery power (420 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
missing Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-30 Vlogging information
Sony RX10 III Vlogging information
18
lack of video recording
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
comes with external mic port
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-30 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-30 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus E-30Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-30 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Type Advanced DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-03-24 2016-03-29
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology HyperCrystal II LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 98% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.56x 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 13.00 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 695 grams (1.53 lbs) 1051 grams (2.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 70
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 12.6
DXO Low light rating 530 472
Other
Battery life 750 pictures 420 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLM-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $1,299 $1,398