Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7bbb/a7bbb390f9986c1e7150b0a6b5b379be6bcbd98e" alt="Olympus E-510 front Olympus E-510 front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
42 Overall
43
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released November 2007
- Also Known as EVOLT E-510
- Older Model is Olympus E-500
- Updated by Olympus E-520
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-510, both Advanced DSLR cameras and they are both offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the E-510 (10MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-300 was revealed 3 years prior to the E-510 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 grades against the E-510 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-510. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus E-510 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-510
E-300 | E-510 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus E-300
E-510 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2007 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 34 months |
Screen dimensions | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-510
E-300 | E-510 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-510 has proportions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-510 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 and the E-510.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c199/0c1996ed1f6455ce71ece213b9ee0d3778515514" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and E-510 is 67 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f01a9/f01a9d83931fd537c7c2c4766d3accbe0d4c8183" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and E-510.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus E-510 to render extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc04c/dc04cd1f7dd76a742446346c51f1593d19b6abc3" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b98ca/b98ca8b41d4d19a2a8f903ed658e96e83af17759" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-510 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus E-510 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus E-510 |
Other name | EVOLT E-300 | EVOLT E-510 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2007-11-23 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 490 grams (1.08 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 442 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $800 | $550 |