Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M1 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-300 was released 9 years prior to the E-M1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-300 matches up vs the E-M1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M1
E-300 | E-M1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus E-300
E-M1 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 107 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+903k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M1
E-300 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-300 vs the E-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e0ef/6e0efb1be0034d5a74eaed7ae5c3a4c376115bdb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and E-M1 is 67 and 71 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9487c/9487c75cd2e5492ca19b40619557ff3ceb02f0d2" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and E-M1.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d02e2/d02e257b2cb000aadf123f338e6979ea60c0ebe8" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c042d/c042d284eef95411aac921ddd53af6c2d6fe091e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2013-10-28 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 497 grams (1.10 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $800 | $799 |