Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was announced 12 years before the E-M1 II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the E-M1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-300 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-300

 E-M1 II E-300 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2005More modern by 142 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1037k134kSharper display (+903k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M1 II

 E-300 E-M1 II 
Manual focus Very exact focus

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the E-M1 II.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and E-M1 II is 67 and 68 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and E-M1 II.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to give you more detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
48
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
MP count low (8MP)
75
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than competition in class (574g)
good ISO range (25,600)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography details
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
bad battery power (350 shots)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography advice
45
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (8MP)
display is not selfie friendly
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather proof
comes with touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly display
bad battery power (350 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography features
43
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Time Lapse recording
76
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
has dual storage slots
bad battery power (350 per charge)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
79
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone jack
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Olympus E-300Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2005-01-10 2016-09-19
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 400 25600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 121
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 134k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution None 4096x2160
Video data format - MOV, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 574g (1.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 80
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 1312
Other
Battery life - 350 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots 1 2
Launch price $800 $1,700