Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also Known as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-300 was announced 12 years before the E-M1 II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-300 scores versus the E-M1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-300 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-300
E-M1 II | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | January 2005 | More modern by 142 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 134k | Sharper display (+903k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M1 II
E-300 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 offers outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 vs the E-M1 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and E-M1 II is 67 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and E-M1 II.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M1 II to give you more detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 1 | 2 |
Launch price | $800 | $1,700 |