Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 front
Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
73
Overall
61

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
  • Released March 2014
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview

In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (Four Thirds).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was announced 10 years prior to the E-M10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-300 matches up vs the E-M10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M10

 E-300 E-M10 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus E-300

 E-M10 E-300 
ReleasedMarch 2014January 2005More recent by 111 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1037k134kSharper display (+903k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M10

 E-300 E-M10 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 enjoys outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has specifications of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-300 against the E-M10.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-M10 is 67 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E-M10.

As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus E-M10 to show extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M10 as a Portrait photography camera
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
71
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus E-M10
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch focus
good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Olympus E-M10 Sports photography factors
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-300
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10
45
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
67
provides touch focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography highlights
43
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8")
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
no Time Lapse function
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M10 Vlogging highlights
9
lack of video recording
33
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (396 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M10
 Olympus E-300Olympus OM-D E-M10
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus OM-D E-M10
Other name EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-01-10 2014-03-18
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 25600
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 1.8 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 1,037 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.58x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per second 8.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m (ISO100)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64)
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 pounds) 396 grams (0.87 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 72
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 884
Other
Battery life - 320 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10))
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $800 $600