Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-300 was launched 11 years earlier than the E-M10 II and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-300 grades vs the E-M10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-300 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-300
E-M10 II | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | January 2005 | More recent by 129 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 134k | Sharper display (+906k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-M10 II
E-300 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has got outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-300 compared to the E-M10 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-M10 II is 67 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and E-M10 II.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus E-M10 II to show more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 390 grams (0.86 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $800 | $499 |