Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Revealed January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-P2, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-300 was brought out 6 years earlier than the E-P2 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-300 matches up against the E-P2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus PEN E-P2. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-P2
E-300 | E-P2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-300
E-P2 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2010 | ![]() | January 2005 | More recent by 64 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-P2
E-300 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P2 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-P2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 versus the E-P2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19723/197230d713c8510f4aa9b9310f5ee4e9995876bb" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and E-P2 is 67 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88abb/88abbf416f91a2a966c27c4a290c9f1108d87991" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and E-P2.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus E-P2 to resolve extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0f2f/d0f2f370386b9509a7a0d0e3d2470667cfd5d74b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6879/b6879800b6e2c6c80479a1afc182b3817ca31313" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2005-01-10 | 2010-04-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $800 | $799 |