Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Revealed January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed November 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PL2
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview

Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-PL1s, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was launched 6 years earlier than the E-PL1s and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the E-PL1s in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-PL1s

 E-300 E-PL1s 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus E-300

 E-PL1s E-300 
RevealedNovember 2010January 2005More recent by 71 months
Display dimension2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PL1s

 E-300 E-PL1s 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has proportions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus E-PL1s in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-300 compared to the E-PL1s.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and E-PL1s is 67 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and E-PL1s.

Clearly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus E-PL1s to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL1s
48
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (8MP)
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
supports RAW formats
low resolution (12 megapixels)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus E-PL1s
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Sports photography camera
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
44
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
low resolution (12MP)
not so great battery pack (290 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography factors
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (290 shots)
low resolution (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL1s
43
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Timelapse function
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inches)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (290 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focus
does not have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PL1s
 Olympus E-300Olympus PEN E-PL1s
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Alternate name EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2005-01-10 2010-11-16
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Truepic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 400 6400
Highest enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 11
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 134k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lb) 334 grams (0.74 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 290 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $800 $599