Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PL3, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-300 was launched 7 years prior to the E-PL3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-300 matches up vs the E-PL3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus E-PL3

 E-300 E-PL3 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus E-300

 E-PL3 E-300 
RevealedSeptember 2011January 2005More recent by 81 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution460k134kClearer screen (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PL3

 E-300 E-PL3 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-300 has external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL3 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PL3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-300 vs the E-PL3.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and E-PL3 is 67 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The visual below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and E-PL3.

As you can tell, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus E-PL3 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL3
48
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (8MP)
60
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Olympus E-PL3
51
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
84
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PL3 as a Sports photography camera
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
terrible battery (300 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PL3 as a Travel photography camera
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
44
no Timelapse function
terrible battery (300 shots)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-PL3 Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Timelapse function
61
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12MP)
terrible battery (300 CIPA)
no Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging details
Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging details
9
can't record video
34
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus E-PL3
 Olympus E-300Olympus PEN E-PL3
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus PEN E-PL3
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2005-01-10 2011-09-20
Body design Mid-size SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Truepic VI
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 400 12800
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 313g (0.69 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 52
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.9
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 499
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $800 $399