Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
36
Features
35
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2010
  • Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-300 was manufactured 6 years before the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-300 matches up versus the SP-800 UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-300 SP-800 UZ 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-300

 SP-800 UZ E-300 
AnnouncedFebruary 2010January 2005More recent by 61 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-300 SP-800 UZ 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 offers outside measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-300 against the SP-800 UZ.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SP-800 UZ is 67 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and SP-800 UZ.

As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will produce greater detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
48
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (8MP)
28
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Street photography camera
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography info
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography info
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
46
excellent zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Travel photography camera
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
61
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great zoom (840mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Landscape photography camera
43
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is small (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
missing Timelapse function
41
decently wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
24
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Olympus E-300Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2005-01-10 2010-02-02
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 1000
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 143
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-840mm (30.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8" 3"
Display resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 12 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.10 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 455 gr (1.00 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $800 $270