Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Launched July 2011
- Older Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-300 was manufactured 7 years before the SP-810 UZ and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-300 grades vs the SP-810 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-300 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-300
SP-810 UZ | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 79 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-300 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus SP-810 UZ has sizing of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 compared to the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4db8b/4db8bc9753f0acbf6603f3a711aea507bf75213d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SP-810 UZ is 67 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11c90/11c90c5cbe59e9a3acd5e671fcb68f05ae58b191" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and SP-810 UZ.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will result in extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f66ae/f66ae1e808c7b1fd4ac9c5d4a65e1c49d1d29e5b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/934a0/934a03839bf91ee3a192f53557491475e4fad0c9" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 pounds) | 413g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $800 | $280 |