Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus SP-810 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
37
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus SP-810 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
  • 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Older Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SP-810 UZ (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was manufactured 7 years before the SP-810 UZ and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-300 grades vs the SP-810 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-300 SP-810 UZ 
Manually focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-300

 SP-810 UZ E-300 
LaunchedJuly 2011January 2005Fresher by 79 months
Screen dimensions3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k134kCrisper screen (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-810 UZ

 E-300 SP-810 UZ 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus SP-810 UZ has sizing of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-300 compared to the SP-810 UZ.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SP-810 UZ is 67 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and SP-810 UZ.

As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will result in extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Portrait photography details
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
MP count low (8MP)
33
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Street photography details
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Olympus SP-810 UZ Sports photography details
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
40
great zoom range (24-864mm 36.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has tracking focus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200 seconds)
max frames per second low (0.7 frames/s)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-810 UZ as a Travel photography camera
45
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
61
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (864mm)
no Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-810 UZ
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
40
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Olympus SP-810 UZ Vlogging advice
9
no video
27
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
 Olympus E-300Olympus SP-810 UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus SP-810 UZ
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2005-01-10 2011-07-27
Physical type Mid-size SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-864mm (36.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.9-5.7
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 1/4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 0.7 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 6.20 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 pounds) 413g (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $800 $280