Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Renewed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-300 was introduced 9 years before the SZ-16 iHS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-300 grades versus the SZ-16 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-300 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-300
SZ-16 iHS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 97 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-300 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 enjoys physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has measurements of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 against the SZ-16 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e889/4e8896142f7e032327a3bf8dc8179bdcadd9fac5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SZ-16 iHS is 67 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8c2e/a8c2e6885c9861d678844eba08cfcf8a632de5d1" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing specs. The photograph here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and SZ-16 iHS.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will result in extra detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2260/f22600703b66ca4b4b29394f6b7d28cda28f061e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9d44/a9d442b48b709f23eaa9586869b8aa2c167a14fd" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Also called as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 134k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $800 | $230 |