Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus Stylus 5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
27
Overall
32

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus 5010
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Also Known as mju 5010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus 5010, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-300 was announced 6 years earlier than the 5010 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-300 grades versus the 5010 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus 5010

 E-300 5010 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-300

 5010 E-300 
LaunchedJanuary 2010January 2005More recent by 60 months
Display size2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus 5010

 E-300 5010 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus 5010 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-300 compared to the 5010.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and 5010 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The photograph here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-300 and 5010.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus 5010 will offer you more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
Olympus 5010 Portrait photography features
48
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Olympus 5010 Street photography factors
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Olympus 5010 Sports photography factors
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
39
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking focus
slow fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus 5010 as a Travel photography camera
45
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
65
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 5010 as a Landscape photography camera
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse recording
37
pretty wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Olympus 5010
9
no video recording
29
pretty wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus 5010
 Olympus E-300Olympus Stylus 5010
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus Stylus 5010
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 mju 5010
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2005-01-10 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 7cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 126g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $800 $150