Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 9000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37


92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Stylus 9000: A Deep Dive into Two Different Eras of Photography
Choosing the right camera often means weighing a complex blend of features, performance, and your unique photography goals. Today, we’ll dissect two Olympus cameras that represent vastly different approaches and generations: the Olympus E-300, an advanced DSLR from 2005, and the Olympus Stylus 9000, a high-zoom compact from 2009. These models both carry Olympus heritage but target different types of photographers - from enthusiasts craving control to travelers seeking portability.
Having tested thousands of cameras over my 15+ years as a photography gear reviewer, I’ll guide you through a thorough comparison grounded in real-world usage, technical performance, and usability. Let’s explore how these two fare across multiple disciplines - from portraits to wildlife, landscapes to video - to help you find the best fit for your creative journey.
Getting to Know the Cameras: Design, Size, and Handling
Before diving into sensor specs or autofocus systems, let’s talk about the physical experience - how the cameras feel in your hands, their size, and the layout of controls you’ll interact with daily.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
---|---|---|
Body Type | Mid-size DSLR | Compact |
Dimensions (mm) | 147 x 85 x 64 | 96 x 60 x 31 |
Weight | 624g | 225g |
Viewfinder | Optical Pentamirror | None (LCD only) |
Screen Size | 1.8" fixed | 2.7" fixed |
Screen Resolution (dpi) | 134 | 230 |
Lens | Interchangeable (Micro Four Thirds) | Fixed 28-280mm |
Image Stabilization | None | Sensor-shift |
E-300’s robust body reflects its DSLR lineage, designed for photographers who want steady grips, manual control, and interchangeable lenses. Despite being a mid-size SLR, it’s relatively compact by DSLR standards - you won’t feel overwhelmed carrying it on extended shoots.
In contrast, the Stylus 9000 is pocket-friendly, easily slipping into a jacket pocket or bag. Its small, durable compact body appeals to travelers and candid street photographers who prioritize discretion and ease over manual control.
Both cameras feature fixed LCDs, but the Stylus’s larger, sharper 2.7” screen makes composing and reviewing shots more enjoyable than the E-300’s smaller and lower resolution 1.8” display.
If you value tactile dials, external controls, and a traditional photo-taking experience, the E-300 wins hands down. For grab-and-go shooting with minimal fuss, the Stylus 9000 offers simplicity with a versatile zoom.
Designing Control and Interface: How You Interact Matters
Control layout and usability are key in fast-paced photography. The Olympus E-300 has a DSLR top plate crowded with dials and buttons, while the Stylus 9000 employs a minimalist approach optimized for point-and-shoot users.
- E-300 features dedicated shutter speed and aperture dials, exposure compensation buttons, and a traditional AF select lever, giving you direct access to settings – critical when racing to nail landscapes or sports shots.
- Stylus 9000 leans on menus and fewer buttons. It lacks full manual exposure modes and instead relies on programmed auto modes and simple scene presets wrapped in a compact user interface.
If you like to actively tweak exposure on the fly or customize controls extensively, the E-300’s hands-on design will satisfy. Conversely, the Stylus’s straightforward grip and simple button layout shine for casual users or beginners stepping up from smartphones.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Let’s get to the camera brains - the sensors. Sensor size and technology deeply influence image quality, noise performance, and dynamic range.
Specification | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) | 1/2.3 inch (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
Sensor Area | 224.9 mm² | 27.7 mm² |
Resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
Max Native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Aspect Ratios | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3, 3:2 |
Raw Support | Yes | No |
The E-300’s Four Thirds sensor is significantly larger, offering approximately 8 times the surface area of the Stylus 9000’s smaller sensor. This size advantage yields better control of depth of field, higher dynamic range, and cleaner images at low ISO settings.
Despite the Stylus boasting a higher resolution of 12 megapixels, its small sensor struggles with noise beyond ISO 400. The E-300 maxes out at ISO 400 for meaningful use but produces relatively cleaner images, thanks to its larger pixels and less aggressive noise reduction.
The E-300 supports RAW files, giving you immense flexibility in post-processing - adjusting exposure, white balance, and recovering shadow detail with professional software. The Stylus 9000 shoots only JPEG, limiting post-production options.
Bottom line for image quality: The E-300 outperforms the Stylus 9000 for image purity, control, and editing versatility thanks to its larger sensor and RAW support, though the Stylus serves well for casual snapshots at its base ISO.
Autofocus and Metering: Speed and Precision in Focus
Your autofocus system is the difference between missing a fleeting gesture and catching a winning moment. Let's look at how both cameras deliver in AF performance.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Type | Phase-detection, 3 points | Contrast-detection |
AF Points | 3 (multi-area AF included) | 1 (center) |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous | Single only |
Live View AF | No | Yes |
Face Detection | No | No |
The E-300 uses a traditional phase-detection AF system with three focus points and includes continuous autofocus, allowing decent tracking of moving subjects. However, by modern standards, three AF points are sparse, and the accuracy is modest, especially in low light or challenging contrast situations.
The Stylus 9000 relies on a contrast-detection AF system with a single center autofocus area, which can be slower but more accurate for stationary subjects. It offers live view autofocus, giving you a preview of focus on the LCD, useful for macro or tricky compositions.
Neither camera features face or eye detection, which means manual focusing precision or careful AF point selection is key, especially when shooting portraits.
Our practical takeaway: For wildlife or sports where continuous AF and speed matter, the E-300 has an edge. For leisurely shooting or macro photography needing accurate still focus, the Stylus 9000 can be more responsive.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Ready for the Outdoors?
Durability is a top concern for many photographers who shoot outdoors, in challenging conditions.
Unfortunately, neither camera offers weather sealing or advanced shockproofing, reflecting their era and market positioning. The E-300’s DSLR body is more robust and better built with higher-quality materials, promising a longer lifespan under heavy use than the lightweight plastic body of the Stylus 9000.
Neither model is dust- or waterproof, so use caution if shooting in rain or dusty environments.
Composing Your Shot: Screens and Viewfinders
Framing your image properly is foundational. Here’s how these cameras help you compose through their displays.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
---|---|---|
Optical Viewfinder | Pentamirror optical | None |
Viewfinder Coverage | Not specified | N/A |
LCD Size | 1.8" fixed | 2.7" fixed |
LCD Resolution | 134 dpi | 230 dpi |
Touchscreen | No | No |
As an SLR, the E-300’s optical pentamirror viewfinder is perfect for bright-light shooting or composing with the clarity of an optical feed. However, its viewfinder suffers from low brightness and limited magnification, which makes fine manual focusing tricky.
The Stylus 9000 dispenses with a viewfinder entirely, relying on its bright, high-resolution LCD for composing shots - better for low light and macro, but tricky in harsh sunlight.
The highly detailed screen on the Stylus offers a nicer framing experience than the E-300’s smaller display, especially when shooting live view.
Lens Compatibility and Imaging Flexibility
Lens choice shapes your creative options. The Olympus E-300 uses a Micro Four Thirds mount system with a growing lens catalog. The Stylus 9000 has a fixed zoom lens with a wide 28-280 mm equivalent range.
Camera | Lens System | Focal Length | Aperture Range | Magnification |
---|---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-300 | Interchangeable Micro Four Thirds | Depends on lens used | Depends on lens | Depends on lens |
Stylus 9000 | Fixed zoom lens | 28-280 mm equivalent | f/3.2 – f/5.9 | Macro focus to 1 cm |
The E-300’s interchangeable lenses deliver ultimate versatility in style: prime lenses for portraits with creamy bokeh, wide-angle lenses for landscapes, and telephotos for wildlife photography.
The Stylus 9000’s one-lens-fits-all zoom, while versatile for travel shooting, is limited by a variable narrow aperture and less ability to isolate subjects creatively.
If you plan shooting specific genres or exploring optics, the E-300’s lens ecosystem is vastly superior.
Burst Speed and Shutter Performance: Capturing the Action
How well can each camera handle rapid-fire shooting?
- E-300: Offers up to 3 frames per second continuous shooting, adequate for casual sports and wildlife sequences.
- Stylus 9000: Does not support continuous shooting modes.
Shutter speed ranges:
- E-300: 60s to 1/4000s - great for long exposures and fast action.
- Stylus 9000: 4s to 1/2000s - more limited, but sufficient for most casual photo needs.
For action photographers looking to catch decisive moments, the E-300’s shutter agility is a major advantage.
Video Capabilities: The Silent Sidekick
Today’s content creators expect video functionality in their cameras. Neither Olympus E-300 nor Stylus 9000 were designed with advanced video in mind.
Feature | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
---|---|---|
Video Recording | None | VGA (640x480) Motion JPEG |
Frame Rates | N/A | 30 & 15 fps |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Image Stabilization | No | Yes (sensor shift) |
While the Stylus 9000 offers very limited VGA video recording, the E-300 does not support video at all. If video is a priority for you, these models won’t suffice.
However, the Stylus’s sensor-shift image stabilization helps smooth handheld video and photos, a notable plus for casual videographers.
Specialized Photography: Macro, Night, Portraits, and More
Portrait Photography
- E-300: With interchangeable lenses and larger sensor, you can achieve beautiful shallow depth of field rendering soft, creamy bokeh for flattering portraits. However, focus points and absence of face detection require skillful focusing to nail perfect eye sharpness.
- Stylus 9000: Limited by small sensor and fixed lens with modest maximum aperture, portraits are more snapshot-like, with less background separation.
Landscape Photography
- E-300: Larger sensor with better dynamic range captures fine detail in shadows and highlights. Manual controls and RAW shooting facilitate creative exposure bracketing and color adjustments.
- Stylus 9000: Macro mode allows close-up floral or texture shots down to 1 cm, but smaller sensor restricts tonal range. Fixed lens may limit ultra-wide perspectives.
Wildlife and Sports
- E-300: Faster burst shooting, phase-detection AF, and better telephoto lens options offer stronger performance in fast-action capture.
- Stylus 9000: Long zoom means you can reach distant subjects, but slower autofocus and single shot mode limit capturing decisive moments.
Night and Astro
- E-300: Sensor size and manual exposure let you experiment with long exposures, but ISO ceiling of 400 restricts performance in very low light.
- Stylus 9000: Higher ISO settings technically available, but small sensor noise renders images less usable.
Battery Life and Storage Options
- Both cameras use removable batteries, but details on capacity are sparse. The E-300’s DSLR-style power usage demands carry spare batteries for daylong shoots.
- The Stylus’s compact design and fixed lens require less power overall and are likely more battery efficient.
- Storage-wise, the E-300 uses Compact Flash cards (Type I or II), while the Stylus 9000 supports multiple media including xD Picture Card, microSD card, and internal memory.
- The Stylus’s USB 2.0 interface is faster for file transfers compared to the E-300’s slower USB 1.0.
Connectivity and Extras
Both models lack wireless connectivity, GPS, Bluetooth, or HDMI ports. This reflects their release era but limits modern workflow conveniences such as instant sharing or tethered shooting.
The E-300’s external flash compatibility supports more advanced lighting setups, while the Stylus has only a built-in flash - adequate for snapshots but restrictive for creative lighting.
Real-World Samples: Image Quality in Action
Let’s look at how these cameras perform in actual shooting conditions.
- Portraits from the E-300 exhibit smoother skin tones and natural bokeh.
- Stylus 9000 delivers decent scenes but lacks depth and sharpness on distant subjects.
- The E-300 excels in landscape photos with better shadow detail.
- Macro shots from Stylus show impressive close focusing but softness in corners.
- Night shots reveal noise limitations on both, with E-300 producing cleaner results at base ISO.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
---|---|
Pros: Large Four Thirds sensor; RAW support; interchangeable lenses; fast shutter and continuous AF; optical viewfinder; manual and semi-auto exposure modes; external flash compatibility | Pros: Compact and lightweight; long 10x zoom lens; image stabilization; higher max ISO; live view focusing; decent screen resolution; simple operation |
Cons: Older AF system with only 3 points; low-res LCD; no image stabilization; limited ISO range; no video; no weather sealing | Cons: Small sensor limits image quality; fixed lens with narrow aperture; no RAW; no continuous shooting; limited exposure controls; no viewfinder |
How They Score: Overall and By Genre
The E-300 scores higher overall for image quality, manual control, and professional flexibility, especially in:
- Portraits
- Landscapes
- Wildlife
- Sports
The Stylus 9000 scores better for:
- Travel photography (size & zoom)
- Street photography (discretion)
- Macro close-ups (due to macro lens capabilities)
Who Should Choose Which
Choose Olympus E-300 if:
- You are stepping into DSLR photography seeking full control over exposure and focus.
- You want to invest in lenses and build a versatile system for multiple genres.
- You shoot portraits or landscapes requiring RAW files and better image quality.
- You appreciate an optical viewfinder for precise framing.
- You want a camera capable of capturing action with continuous autofocus and burst capture.
Choose Olympus Stylus 9000 if:
- Your priority is a lightweight, pocketable camera for travel and everyday use.
- You need a superzoom lens covering wide-angle to telephoto in one body.
- You shoot mostly in good light, enjoying casual photography with minimal setup.
- You value image stabilization and a sharp LCD for composing shots.
- You want simple operation without the learning curve of manual settings.
Final Thoughts: Tradition or Convenience?
The Olympus E-300 is a snapshot of DSLR enthusiasm circa 2005: solidly built, sensor-wise ahead of its time, and ready for photographic exploration if you’re willing to master its quirks and modest autofocus system. It remains a valuable tool for those wanting a manual photography experience with interchangeable lenses and professional file handling.
The Olympus Stylus 9000, while less ambitious technically, caters perfectly to a different kind of photographer. If convenience, zoom versatility, and straightforward automatic shooting appeal more to you, it can be a rewarding travel companion with great macro abilities.
Our advice? If you can, try both cameras in person to feel the handling differences and check image previews directly. Think about your main photography interests and how much control or simplicity you want. Both are gateways into the Olympus family, offering distinct paths to creating memorable images.
Next Steps
- Explore lens options for the E-300 to tailor your shooting style.
- Test out macro capabilities on the Stylus during your next nature walk.
- Dive into RAW processing with sample files from the E-300 to expand your editing skills.
- Consider adding accessories like external flashes for the E-300 or lens adapters if available.
Photography is about matching gear to your vision - and both these cameras offer unique opportunities to learn, create, and enjoy.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also called | EVOLT E-300 | mju 9000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 134k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lbs) | 225g (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $800 | $300 |