Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Pentax WG-3 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Pentax and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-3 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-3 was launched 4 years after the CX1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-3 matches up versus the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Pentax WG-3 & Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are available at Pentax WG-3 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Ricoh CX1
| WG-3 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 54 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Pentax WG-3
| CX1 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax WG-3 and Ricoh CX1
| WG-3 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Pentax WG-3 provides external dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-3 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-3 vs the CX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-3 and CX1 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through technical specs. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-3 and CX1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent WG-3 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax WG-3 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
| Model type | Pentax WG-3 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-07-19 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 180g (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $299 |