Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37


88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SH-2, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

The E-300 was launched 11 years before the SH-2 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-300 matches up against the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SH-2
E-300 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-300
SH-2 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2015 | ![]() | January 2005 | More modern by 123 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+326k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SH-2
E-300 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 has exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-300 vs the SH-2.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and SH-2 is 67 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and SH-2.
All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus SH-2 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $800 | $399 |