Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Older Model is Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SH-3, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-300 was revealed 12 years prior to the SH-3 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-300 scores against the SH-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus SH-3
E-300 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-300
SH-3 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 134 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+326k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SH-3
E-300 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 offers physical dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-300 and Olympus SH-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 versus the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d250/4d2508673517185811fac06ce61c83ee61972399" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and SH-3 is 67 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c849b/c849bc103e1ab519f5ffc853535373dd040baa6d" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and SH-3.
As you can tell, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SH-3 will give you greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2c74/b2c7435f40245cae076d990203de3aa93c3da3c6" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a188/9a188ae9ae1d224ba09a3d55a4e58a494ee25314" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $800 | $579 |