Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-300 was revealed 6 years earlier than the Tough-3000 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-300 grades vs the Tough-3000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-300 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-300
Tough-3000 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | January 2005 | More recent by 60 months | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-300 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 provides outer dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 compared to the Tough-3000.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and Tough-3000 is 67 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and Tough-3000.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus Tough-3000 will give you greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 159 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $800 | $0 |