Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 8010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus 8010, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and 8010 (13MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and 8010 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was launched 6 years earlier than the 8010 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 matches up against the 8010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus 8010

 E-300 8010 
Focus manually More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus E-300

 8010 E-300 
LaunchedFebruary 2010January 2005More modern by 61 months
Display sizing2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kClearer display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus 8010

 E-300 8010 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features external dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus 8010 has dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 versus Olympus 8010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 against the 8010.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and 8010 is 67 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by viewing technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and 8010.

As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus 8010 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-300
Portrait photography with Olympus 8010
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (8 megapixels)
28
good resolution (13MP)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography details
Olympus 8010 Street photography details
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition (245g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography factors
Olympus 8010 Sports photography factors
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
43
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (13 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography advice
Olympus 8010 Travel photography advice
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
64
weather proof
good resolution (13MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (245 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
Olympus 8010 Landscape photography factors
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
missing Timelapse recording
40
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (13 megapixels)
weather proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Olympus 8010 Vlogging factors
9
no video shooting
27
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic support
heavier than competition (245g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus 8010
 Olympus E-300Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 mju Tough 8010
Type Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Announced 2005-01-10 2010-02-02
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 134 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 1/4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lbs) 245g (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $800 $600