Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-300 was announced 10 years prior to the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the TG-850 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| E-300 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-300
| TG-850 iHS | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 | January 2005 | More recent by 110 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| E-300 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 and the TG-850 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-850 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will result in extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Alternative name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-01-29 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $800 | $250 |