Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-300 was announced 10 years prior to the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-300 matches up versus the TG-850 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-300 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-300
TG-850 iHS | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2005 | More recent by 110 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-300 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-300 and the TG-850 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-850 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-300 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will result in extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Alternative name | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $800 | $250 |