Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860
67 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-300 was unveiled 11 years before the TG-860 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-300 grades against the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-860
| E-300 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-300
| TG-860 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | January 2005 | More recent by 122 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860
| E-300 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 and the TG-860.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-860 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-860.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $800 | $279 |