Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Replacement is Olympus TG-870
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was unveiled 11 years before the TG-860 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-300 grades against the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-300 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-860
| E-300 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-300
| TG-860 | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | January 2005 | More recent by 122 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Sharper display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860
| E-300 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 and the TG-860.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-860 is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-860.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Also referred to as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $800 | $279 |