Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Introduced January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2015
  • Replacement is Olympus TG-870
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-300 was unveiled 11 years before the TG-860 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-300 grades against the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus TG-860

 E-300 TG-860 
Focus manually More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-300

 TG-860 E-300 
IntroducedFebruary 2015January 2005More recent by 122 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution460k134kSharper display (+326k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860

 E-300 TG-860 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 features exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 and the TG-860.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and TG-860 is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specs. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and TG-860.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older E-300 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-860 Portrait photography info
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low resolution (8 megapixels)
35
resolution is good (16MP)
provides face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography features
Olympus TG-860 Street photography features
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
69
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Olympus TG-860
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
48
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-860 Travel photography information
45
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
low resolution (8MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
71
environment proofing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (21mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography info
Olympus TG-860 Landscape photography info
43
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
small screen (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low resolution (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
no Time Lapse function
47
relatively wide (21mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-860 Vlogging advice
9
no video recording
33
relatively wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus TG-860
 Olympus E-300Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Introduced 2005-01-10 2015-02-06
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 400 6400
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 1.8" 3"
Resolution of display 134 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Yes
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 lb) 224 gr (0.49 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $800 $279